Why use WebORB?
This comes in from a reader Kai who asked why I use WebORB over the LCDS built with ColdFusion. This was Kai's question:
For those readers who don't know, when Kai says "onTap" I suspect he is referring to Isaac Dealey's onTap framework for ColdFusion. When he talks about BlueDragon, he is referring to the CFML server from New Atlanta. BlueDragon will be released open source under a dual licensing model. The latest release of WebORB supports CFC translation between BlueDragon and the Flash Player, a feature that exists natively in ColdFusion. You could use WebORB and BlueDragon as an alternative to CF and LiveCycle.
Do I prefer one over the other? No, I don't. I've use WebORB when dealing with .NET development and the CF Server (Which has LCDS under the hood) for dealing with web applications.
The benefit to AMF over XML is that the data passed back and forth is smaller, leading to less bandwidth and quicker load times. However,I haven't done any serious AJAX Development. I do know that WebORB has AJAX support. I was aware of AJAX Data Services, but never used that either. I am not aware of any AJAX AMF implementations, so I thought that both WebORB and AJAX Data Services used different protocols for non-Flash player communications.
In terms of Comet or Lightstreamer; I never heard of them before now so cannot comment. Anyone out there want to add their two cents?
A quick reminder to everyone, I love answering people's questions (even though I get busy sometime). Feel free to ask one!




;) To be specific it is an "enriched solution with support for CFML, but with no licensing fee." New Atlanta has been very meticulous in using "CFML" in their advertising, not ColdFusion.
Can you confirm that WebORB AJAX support does not support the AMF protocol?